Go Back

Conventional Wisdom Gets It Wrong Again

by Lobo Tiggre
Tuesday, February 25, 12:00pm, UTC, 2020

When I started in this business 16 years ago, my mentors taught me that geologists rarely make good miners. The two have completely different skills, education, and ways of seeing things. A geologist looks at beautiful rocks and wonders at the mystery of how nature formed them. A mine engineer just wants to know how much it would cost to blast them and haul them away.

The creative mind that can deliver a world-class discovery is rarely the orderly mind that can run a world-class mining operation.

Therefore, speculating on “geologists who want to play with big yellow trucks” is likely to be a losing bet.

Well, I’ve written that conventional wisdom was wrong about the pre-production sweet spot (PPSS). The same research shows that this conventional wisdom is wrong as well. Sort of.

As you may recall, many people had recognized the PPSS before I wrote about it—and even called it that—but they missed just how sweet it is. Similarly, I think my mentors are completely right about geologists usually making lousy miners.

But one of the key features of the PPSS strategy is that we speculate on first-time mine builders during construction.

The PPSS strategy enables us to book our profits before we find out whether or not a mine actually makes money.

In other words, it doesn’t matter statistically whether a company actually succeeds at becoming a profitable producer. It only matters that it succeeds at building its first mine—which depends on the construction crew and engineers, not the geologists.

That’s unless the geologists who decide to play with big yellow trucks are disastrously incompetent, of course. If their companies fail to build their mines (or make probable failure clear to the market) a PPSS trade can still go down in flames.

But the fact remains that it’s possible to win regardless of the eventual mining outcome.

Ideally, I’d like to profit from companies that create value and deliver needed minerals to the world. The PPSS strategy, however, calls for taking profits or exiting entirely before that outcome is known.

I wouldn’t say this is the best part of the whole idea—the relatively high odds of making substantial gains take that cake—but it comes pretty close.

According to my data, the PPSS strategy negates the technical risk of speculating on a largely technical task.

And that is a thing of beauty to me.

Of course, you can’t just throw darts at the board and expect to walk away with a big win here. Due diligence still matters. But everyone can try their hand at it. Done right, the odds of significant success should be much higher than swinging for the bleachers on a new discovery.

If you haven’t read our free report on my latest PPSS research, I strongly encourage you to do so. It includes new findings that can help you improve your odds of success.

Caveat emptor,

 

 

P.S. To be kept abreast of more opportunities and issues affecting resource speculation, please sign up for our free, no-spam, weekly Speculator’s Digest.

Think. Speculate.

Facts and insights to navigate the markets. Delivered FREE.

MEMBERSHIP INCLUDES
  • Free digest with fresh investment-related news and ideas on a daily basis.
  • Free reports on investment ideas for speculators.
  • Honest, unbiased trend analysis
  • Heads up on events, appearances, and other educational opportunities.
Education

Forever Free subscription

MEMBERSHIP INCLUDES
  • Monthly Newsletter Subscription
  • Requests
  • Free Access to Blog
  • Books and More
My Take

$500 (SAVE: $100) for 1-year subscription

$50 for monthly subscription

MEMBERSHIP INCLUDES
  • Field Trip Invitations
  • Free Educational Media
  • Free Access to Blog
  • Books and More
  • Monthly Newsletter Subscription
  • Conference Invitations
The Independent Speculator

$3,000 for 1-year subscription

$1,000 for quarter subscription